Skip to content
Ultimus

04 of 04 · Center

Ultimus Harness.

Sovereign Agentic Harness

The execution layer. Ultimus makes sense of all the context and executes. It is a local-first, model-agnostic agent harness that runs tasks, validates its own work against your test suites, and operates strictly within the policy boundaries you define. It cannot wander, it is completely controlled by the governance you design.

  • Makes sense of context, then acts
  • Validates against your test suites
  • Holds to your policy boundaries
  • Controlled by the governance you design

How it runs

Context in. Work out. Checked.

A task is not done when the model says so. It is done when your tests pass and the record is signed.

  1. 01

    Takes in context

    Internal feeds say what is true about your environment. External feeds say what is true about the world. Both arrive structured.

  2. 02

    Reasons

    It makes sense of the context before it touches anything. The plan is written against your architecture and constraints, not against guesses.

  3. 03

    Acts

    It runs the task in your environment: edits, commands, tool calls. Every one of them goes through the gateway.

  4. 04

    Validates

    It runs your test suites against its own work. If they fail, it is not done.

  5. 05

    Reports, signed

    Every high-consequence action is signed into the record. You get the result and the proof together.

Illustrative run
# Point the harness at a task$ ultimus run "add a retry to the ingest client"  context   internal feed · architecture, constraints, dependencies  policy    loaded  plan      edit src/ingest/client.ts · add a test  act       2 files changed  verify    test suite · passed  record    signed · zephyr  ✓ done # The same harness, asked to step outside policy$ ultimus run "push the fix straight to production"  policy    DENIED (deploy outside allowed_times)  ✗ blocked. nothing ran.

Sovereign

Yours to run. Yours to govern.

Local-first
Ultimus runs in your environment, on your machines. Capture, inbox, and tool calls stay local. Nothing leaves that you did not send.
Model-agnostic
Swap the model underneath and the rules above it do not move. Frontier or open-weight, the harness is the same harness.
Bounded
It operates inside the policy boundaries you define. It cannot wander. If an action violates policy, it is blocked before it runs.

Operator in the loop

It can see the screen.

Snap is open source, in Labs

Visual work is where agents waste the most steps. A misaligned element described in prose costs several rounds: the model reads files, guesses, edits, asks, guesses again.

Ultimus closes that loop directly. The operator freezes the screen, circles the problem, and types "16px gap". The agent receives the marked image and the structured annotation beside it: mark positions, labels, colors, and which window it came from. A layout bug that took four rounds to pin down in words lands in one.

Capture and annotation run entirely on the machine. No network call, no telemetry, no third-party vision service holding a picture of the operator's screen.

110×

What it costs

more per 1,000 output tokens on Claude Code / Opus 5 than on Ultimus. Against Fable 5.1 it is 170×.

Ultimus works the way Codex and Claude Code do. It costs a fraction as much to run.

Measured from 61 real session logs. Cost is measured. The energy figures on the benchmark page are estimates, and only Claude Code was measured, not Codex.

Where it sits

The center of the four.

Two modules give the harness its context. One governs what reaches it and keeps the record of what it does.

Questions.

What does the harness do?

It makes sense of all the context and executes. Context flows in from your environment and from external feeds. Ultimus reasons over it, runs the task, and checks its own work.

What does local-first mean here?

Ultimus runs in your environment. The harness is sovereign. You keep control of where it runs.

Which models does it support?

It is model-agnostic. The harness does not tie you to one model provider.

How does Ultimus compare with Claude Code on cost?

In a benchmark of 61 real session logs, Ultimus on an open-weight model cost about 110× less per 1,000 output tokens than Claude Code on Opus 5. Cost is measured, and the energy figures are estimates. Only Claude Code was measured, not Codex.

Can it act outside its policy?

No. It cannot wander. It operates strictly within the policy boundaries you define, and it is completely controlled by the governance you design.

How does it check its own work?

It validates results against your test suites before it reports done.

Next module · Inside

Internal Context Feeds